Legislature(2003 - 2004)
2004-03-29 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2004-03-29 House Journal Page 3116 HB 514 The following was read the second time: HOUSE BILL NO. 514 "An Act relating to child support modification and enforcement, to the establishment of paternity by the child support enforcement agency, and to the crimes of criminal nonsupport and aiding the nonpayment of child support; amending Rule 90.3, Alaska Rules of Civil Procedure; and providing for an effective date." with the: Journal Page JUD RPT CS(JUD) 5DP 2810 FN1: INDETERMINATE(ADM) 2810 FN2: INDETERMINATE(CRT) 2810 FN3: INDETERMINATE(LAW) 2810 FIN RPT CS(FIN) 4DP 3NR 2AM 3052 FN2: INDETERMINATE(CRT) 3053 FN3: INDETERMINATE(LAW) 3053 FN4: ZERO(ADM); FN5: ZERO(ADM) 3053 FN6: ZERO(DPS) 3053 FN7: (REV) 3053 Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the following committee substitute be adopted in lieu of the original bill: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 514(FIN) (same title) 2004-03-29 House Journal Page 3117 There being no objection, it was so ordered. Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representatives Croft and Kott: Page 3, lines 21 - 28: Delete all material and insert: "(A) being a person with a statutory duty to disclose information to a child support enforcement agency, withholds the information [ABOUT THE RESIDENCE OR EMPLOYMENT OF THE OBLIGOR] when it [THAT INFORMATION] is requested by a child support enforcement agency; (B) being an employer of the obligor, withholds information about the residence or employment of the obligor, the eligibility of the obligor's children for coverage under the employer's health insurance plan, or [ABOUT] the cost of the coverage of the children under the plan, when that information is requested by a child support enforcement agency or when the employer is required by state or federal law to report the information without a request by a child support enforcement agency; or" Page 3, line 29: Delete "or employment" Insert "[OR] employment, or other" Representative Croft moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 be adopted. Objection was heard and withdrawn. There being no further objection, Amendment No. 1 was adopted. Amendment No. 2 was offered by Representatives Croft and Kott: Page 5, following line 16: Insert a new subsection to read: "(f) The agency may employ investigators who may exercise the power of peace officers when those powers are specifically granted by the agency to that investigator. Peace officer powers granted by the agency under this subsection may be exercised for 2004-03-29 House Journal Page 3118 protection in the line of duty. An investigator granted and who is exercising peace officer powers under this subsection may carry a firearm only if the investigator (1) has completed a peace officer training academy program; and (2) has met annual firearm certification requirements that are equivalent to those required by the Department of Public Safety." Renumber the following subsections accordingly. Representative Croft moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 2 be adopted. Objection was heard. Amendment No. 1 to Amendment No. 2 was offered by Representative Gara: Following "(1) has": Insert "successfully" Representative Gara moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 to Amendment No. 2 be adopted. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Amendment No. 2 to Amendment No. 2 as amended was offered by Representative Ogg: Under (f), following "agency under this subsection may": Insert "only" Representative Ogg moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 2 to Amendment No. 2 as amended be adopted. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Amendment No. 3 to Amendment No. 2 as amended was offered by Representative Hawker: 2004-03-29 House Journal Page 3119 Under (1), following "program": Insert "meeting the minimum standards required by the Alaska Police Standards Council for all other state police officers" Representative Hawker moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 3 to Amendment No. 2 as amended be adopted. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Hawker placed a call of the House. The call was satisfied. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 2 as amended be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 514(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 2 as amended YEAS: 15 NAYS: 24 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Anderson, Crawford, Croft, Dahlstrom, Gara, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Hawker, Heinze, Kott, Lynn, McGuire, Moses, Ogg, Samuels Nays: Berkowitz, Chenault, Cissna, Coghill, Fate, Foster, Harris, Holm, Joule, Kapsner, Kerttula, Kohring, Kookesh, Masek, Meyer, Morgan, Rokeberg, Seaton, Stepovich, Stoltze, Weyhrauch, Williams, Wilson, Wolf Excused: Gatto And so, Amendment No. 2 as amended was not adopted. Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB 514(FIN) am be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading, and placed on final passage. Objection was heard. CSHB 514(FIN) am will advance to third reading on the March 31, 2004, calendar.